đź”® GitHub co-founder & ex-CEO, Tom Preston-Werner, joins Pullflow as an investor!

The Anti-Spaghetti Manifesto: A Ride through the Perils of Clean Code! | Pullflow Blog

The Anti-Spaghetti Manifesto: A Ride through the Perils of Clean Code!

Discover the secrets of writing clean code that is easy to understand, maintain, and impress your fellow developers (not really).

Syeda Zainab
Syeda Zainab - Tue Jun 06 2023
The Anti-Spaghetti Manifesto: A Ride through the Perils of Clean Code!


  • Code reviews are opportunities for collaboration, growth, and enhancing code quality.
  • Code review tools are useful, but human insights and judgment are irreplaceable.
  • Professionalism extends beyond code reviews and should permeate all aspects of software development.
  • Clean code principles include managing complexity, proper naming, effective error handling, and clear boundaries.
  • Unit tests should be focused, readable, and maintainable.
  • Well-designed classes follow SOLID principles and exhibit cohesion and loose coupling.
  • Concurrency requires proper synchronization, thread safety, and error handling.
  • Clean design follows principles like SOLID, Law of Demeter, and favors composition over inheritance.

Picture this: You’re sitting at your desk, staring at a screen filled with lines upon lines of code. It’s a tangled mess, resembling a plate of spaghetti more than an elegant solution. As a software engineer, you know the struggle of dealing with messy codebases all too well. That’s why today, we embark on a thrilling journey through the perils of clean code. Welcome to The Anti-Spaghetti Manifesto!

The Code Review Conundrum: A Balancing Act of Objectivity and Empathy

Code reviews—the holy grail of clean code! It’s an art form that requires a delicate balance between objectivity and empathy. We’ve all been there, receiving feedback that can be both enlightening and soul-crushing. But fear not, dear developers, for I have some tales from the trenches to share.

In a recent code review, I found myself on the receiving end of some brutal feedback. The reviewer tore apart my carefully crafted code, leaving me feeling a mix of anger and humiliation. However, instead of sulking in despair, I chose to embrace the feedback as an opportunity for growth. I engaged in a dialogue with the reviewer, seeking clarification and discussing alternative approaches. Through this exchange, I not only improved the code but also forged a connection with a fellow developer.

Remember, code reviews are not about pointing fingers or proving superiority. They are about collaboration, learning, and collectively striving for code excellence. So, let’s dive deeper into the nuances of code reviews and discover how we can make them an invaluable tool in our clean code arsenal.

The Science of Effective Feedback: Constructive Criticism at its Finest

Imagine this scenario: You stumble upon a particularly messy piece of code. Instead of immediately bashing the developer responsible, take a moment to understand the context. Engage in a dialogue, asking questions that uncover their thought process.

By doing so, you’ll foster a sense of trust and create an environment where developers feel comfortable sharing their challenges and seeking guidance.

Remember, empathy is the secret sauce to effective feedback. Put yourself in the shoes of the developer, acknowledge their effort, and provide specific suggestions for improvement. Let’s make feedback a catalyst for growth rather than a weapon of destruction.

Unleashing the Power of Pair Programming: A Tale of Collaboration and Creativity

Ah, pair programming—the art of coding together, shoulder to shoulder, tackling problems as a dynamic duo. Some may argue that it’s time-consuming or inefficient, but I’m here to tell you otherwise.

I recall a particularly challenging project that seemed insurmountable. Frustrated and overwhelmed, I sought the help of a colleague. Together, we embarked on an epic coding journey, armed with our laptops and an unyielding determination. What started as a daunting task soon transformed into a thrilling adventure, filled with laughter, shared victories, and the occasional friendly debate.

Pair programming goes beyond mere productivity. It’s a collaborative experience that fuels creativity, nurtures camaraderie, and elevates the quality of code. So, don’t hesitate to grab a coding buddy and embark on your own epic quest!

Beyond the Comfort Zone: Embracing New Paradigms and Tools

As developers, it’s easy to fall into the trap of sticking with what we know. But in the ever-evolving landscape of software engineering, embracing new paradigms and tools is essential for growth.

I remember the first time I ventured into the world of functional programming. It was like learning a new language, with strange terms like “monads” and “higher-order functions” floating around. Yet, as I delved deeper, I discovered the elegance and expressiveness of functional programming, and how it could drastically improve the readability and maintainability of my code.

Stepping outside our comfort zone can be intimidating, but it opens doors to new possibilities and expands our problem-solving toolkit. So, dare to explore new languages, experiment with unfamiliar frameworks, and challenge the status quo. The rewards are worth the initial discomfort.

Now that we have set the stage for the perils of messy code and the importance of clean code, let’s dive into the wild ride through the various chapters that will equip us with the knowledge and tools to tackle these challenges head-on.

I know you know, but what is clean code?

Clean code is like a well-organized closet. It’s structured, readable, and easy to navigate. It follows a set of principles and best practices that aim to minimize complexity and maximize understandability. It’s not just about making the code work; it’s about making it easy for other developers to understand and modify. Think of it as a love letter to your fellow coders, saying, “Hey, I’ve got your back.”

Untangling the web of coding complexity

Now, let’s talk about the beast we all face: complexity. It’s like wrestling an octopus while blindfolded. Managing complexity is a fundamental part of writing clean code, and it’s no easy feat. But fear not, brave coder! There are strategies to tame this wild creature.

One strategy is the art of separation of concerns. Imagine breaking down a complex problem into bite-sized pieces, each with its own purpose. It’s like assembling a team of specialists, each tackling a specific aspect of the problem. By dividing and conquering, we can slay the complex dragon and emerge victorious.

Another tool in our arsenal is abstraction. It’s like wearing sunglasses that filter out unnecessary details. Abstraction allows us to hide the nitty-gritty implementation and expose only the essentials. We create a clean and elegant facade with well-defined interfaces and classes, shielding the complexity from prying eyes.

Deciphering the enigma of naming things

In the quest for clean code, proper naming is paramount. Well-chosen and descriptive names enhance code readability and convey the code’s intent without the need for extensive comments. Clean code adheres to specific naming conventions and guidelines to ensure clarity and consistency.

To achieve clean and meaningful names, it’s essential to:

  1. Use descriptive and self-explanatory names: Variables, functions, classes, and other code elements should have names that accurately describe their purpose and functionality. Avoid single-letter names or ambiguous abbreviations that can hinder understanding.
  2. Maintain consistency with naming conventions: Follow the established naming conventions of the programming language or framework you’re using. For instance, in Python, variables and functions are typically named using lowercase letters with words separated by underscores (e.g., total_price). In Java, the convention is to use camel case (e.g., calculateTotalPrice).
  3. Choose descriptive names for methods and functions: Method and function names should clearly indicate their actions and return values. Use verbs for actions and nouns for objects or concepts. For example, consider using calculateTotalPrice() or getCustomerName().
  4. Avoid misleading names: Be cautious of names that could lead to confusion or misinterpretation. Use names that accurately represent the purpose or behavior of the code element.

Functions - the unsung heroes of clean code

Functions are vital components of clean code. They should be concise, focused on a single task, and adhere to the principles of high cohesion and low coupling. Clean code advocates for functions that are easy to read, understand, and test.

To create clean functions, it’s important to:

Keep functions small: Functions should ideally be short and focused, performing a single task with a clear and well-defined purpose. This improves code readability and facilitates understanding and reasoning about the codebase.

Follow the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP): Functions should have a single responsibility and avoid attempting to accomplish too many tasks at once. If a function becomes lengthy or complex, consider refactoring it into smaller, more manageable functions.

Minimize parameter usage: Functions with numerous parameters can be challenging to comprehend and maintain. If a function requires multiple inputs, consider encapsulating related parameters into a data structure or creating a specialized object.

Avoid side effects: Ideally, functions should have no side effects, meaning they should not modify variables outside of their scope or rely on external dependencies. This approach enhances code predictability, and ease of testing, and reduces the likelihood of bugs.

A commentary on the art of not writing code comments

In the realm of clean code, the philosophy is that “code should be self-explanatory.” While comments can be valuable in certain scenarios, clean code advocates for minimizing their usage and relying on well-written and expressive code instead. The goal is to write code that is so clear and understandable that comments become unnecessary.

To achieve self-explanatory code, consider the following practices:

  1. Write expressive code: Focus on code that is easy to understand without relying heavily on comments. Use meaningful names, follow best practices, and structure your code logically and intuitively.
  2. Remove redundant comments: Comments that state the obvious or duplicate the code’s meaning are redundant and should be eliminated. Redundant comments clutter the codebase and can become misleading if they don’t remain synchronized with the actual code.
  3. Use comments sparingly for clarifications: Although comments should generally be avoided, there are situations where they can provide valuable clarifications. Utilize comments to explain complex algorithms, justify design decisions, or highlight potential pitfalls.

The style showdown: formatting for the win

Formatting plays a significant role in clean code. Consistent and well-formatted code enhances readability and reduces cognitive load. Clean code adheres to established formatting guidelines and conventions to ensure a consistent style throughout the codebase.

Consider the following formatting practices:

  1. Use consistent indentation: Consistently indent your code to improve its visual structure and make it easier to follow. Most programming languages have established indentation conventions, such as using spaces or tabs.
  2. Limit line length: Long lines of code can be difficult to read, especially when working with multiple code editors or viewing code on smaller screens. Limit the line length to a reasonable number of characters, often 80 or 120 characters, depending on the conventions of the programming language.
  3. Add vertical whitespace: Use vertical whitespace to separate logical sections of code, making it easier to identify different blocks of code and improving overall readability.
  4. Maintain consistent placement of braces and parentheses: Follow the established conventions for placing braces and parentheses. For example, in languages like Java and C#, it is common to place the opening brace on the same line as the function or statement, while in languages like JavaScript, the opening brace is often placed on a new line.

Data structures, objects, and the law of Demeter: a tangled tale

In the world of clean code, it’s crucial to pay attention to the design of your data structures and objects. By adhering to the Law of Demeter, we can achieve loose coupling and encapsulation—key principles that lead to clean and maintainable code.

When it comes to data structures, choose wisely. Select the data structures that best fit the problem at hand and provide efficient data access and manipulation. Whether it’s arrays, lists, sets, maps, or custom data structures, make sure you understand their trade-offs and choose the most appropriate one.

Encapsulation is another vital aspect. It involves bundling data and related behavior into objects. By encapsulating data and behavior, we promote information hiding and separate concerns effectively. Each object becomes responsible for managing its own data and behavior, encapsulating its internal state and providing a clean interface for interaction.

Now, let’s talk about the Law of Demeter. According to this principle, an object should limit its communication to its immediate neighbors, avoiding unnecessary knowledge of the inner workings of other objects. By reducing dependencies between objects, we achieve loose coupling and minimize the impact of changes in one object on the rest of the system. This principle encourages clean and modular code design.

The error handling odyssey: triumph over chaos

Error handling is a critical aspect of writing clean code. It ensures the reliability and maintainability of our software systems. Clean code promotes explicit error handling, meaningful error messages, and separation of error handling from the core logic.

When it comes to error handling, it’s essential to choose the appropriate mechanism provided by your programming language. Whether it’s exceptions, error codes, or result objects, select the mechanism that aligns with your codebase’s requirements and conventions.

Explicitly handling errors is a fundamental principle. Avoid silent failures or ignoring errors altogether. Instead, handle errors explicitly and take appropriate actions. This could include logging the error, providing user-friendly error messages, or implementing graceful recovery strategies.

Keeping error handling separate from the core logic is crucial for code readability and maintainability. By isolating error-related concerns, we maintain a clear and focused main codebase, making it easier to understand and modify.

Lastly, let’s emphasize the importance of providing meaningful error messages. When an error occurs, make sure to include relevant information in the error message. This information helps users or developers understand the problem and take appropriate actions to resolve it efficiently. Clear and informative error messages can save valuable debugging time and enhance the overall user experience.

Boundaries demystified: navigating the coding frontiers

Clean code not only focuses on the internal structure of our code but also emphasizes the importance of understanding and managing boundaries in software development. Boundaries exist between different components, systems, or external dependencies, and by understanding and respecting these boundaries, we can create cleaner and more maintainable code.

One way to handle boundaries is by wrapping external dependencies. When working with external libraries, frameworks, or services, we can create an abstraction layer by wrapping them in interfaces or adapters. This layer shields our codebase from the complexities and changes of the external dependency, making it easier to switch or upgrade the dependency in the future.

Defining clear interfaces between different components or modules is another vital aspect. Well-defined interfaces promote loose coupling and exchangeability of implementations. They make it easier to reason about the behavior of our code and facilitate testing and mocking.

Dependency injection is a technique that aids in managing boundaries. Instead of hard-coding dependencies within a class, we provide them from the outside using dependency injection. This approach promotes flexibility, testability, and decoupling, as the class is not responsible for creating or managing its dependencies.

When interacting with external systems or dependencies, it’s crucial to handle boundary interactions gracefully. We should anticipate potential failures or edge cases and implement appropriate error handling, retries, or fallback mechanisms. This ensures the stability and resilience of our code, even in the face of unexpected circumstances.

Unraveling the secrets of pristine unit tests

Clean code principles extend to unit tests as well. Well-written tests enhance code quality and provide confidence in the correctness of our software. Clean unit tests follow best practices and principles, such as readability, focus, and maintainability.

One important pattern for structuring unit tests is the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern. The arrangement phase sets up the necessary preconditions for the test, the action phase performs the operation being tested, and the assertion phase verifies the expected outcomes. Following this pattern helps to organize and structure tests in a clear and understandable manner.

Writing focused and independent tests is essential. Each unit test should focus on a specific behavior or scenario, testing a single concept or functionality. By keeping tests independent of each other, we avoid dependencies and ensure that each test can be understood and executed in isolation.

Descriptive test names play a significant role in conveying the purpose and intent of the test. Clear and meaningful names make it easier for developers to understand the behavior being tested and locate issues when they arise.

Moreover, clean unit tests prioritize readability and maintainability. They avoid unnecessary complexity or clever tricks that could obscure the test’s intent. Striking a balance between readability and coverage ensures that tests effectively verify the desired behavior and remain maintainable over time.

Classes unleashed: the epic quest for code cohesion

Clean code places a strong emphasis on well-designed classes. Classes should be cohesive, have a single responsibility, and adhere to the SOLID principles. By creating clean and focused classes, we improve code readability, maintainability, and reusability.

Imagine classes as superheroes, each with their unique powers and responsibilities. Just like superheroes, classes should have a clear purpose and not take on more than they can handle. They should do one thing exceptionally well and delegate other tasks to collaborating classes, promoting a modular and organized codebase.

To achieve this, we follow the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP). Each class should have a single responsibility or reason to change. This makes our code more manageable, as we can pinpoint specific classes responsible for specific tasks. We can encapsulate data and behavior within classes, exposing only what’s necessary and hiding implementation details through encapsulation and information hiding.

Additionally, classes should exhibit high cohesion, where members and methods work together towards a common goal. Avoid classes that try to juggle multiple unrelated functionalities, as this can lead to confusion and complexity. By keeping classes focused, we create code that is easier to understand, test, and maintain.

One way to achieve this cohesion is by adhering to the Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP). This principle encourages depending on abstractions rather than concrete implementations. By decoupling classes from specific dependencies, we gain flexibility and extensibility in our code.

The wild ride of concurrency: hold on tight!

Clean code acknowledges the challenges and complexities of writing concurrent code. It emphasizes the need for proper synchronization, thread safety, and error handling when dealing with concurrency. By writing clean concurrent code, we can avoid race conditions, deadlocks, and other common concurrency issues.

Concurrency is like orchestrating a group of synchronized dancers. It requires careful coordination and communication to prevent collisions and ensure harmony. Similarly, in code, we must pay attention to shared resources and threads, synchronizing their interactions to avoid conflicts.

One important principle is to minimize or eliminate shared mutable state between concurrent threads. Immutable data structures or thread-safe objects can help reduce the risk of race conditions where multiple threads access and modify shared data simultaneously. Proper synchronization mechanisms such as locks, mutexes, or atomic operations should be used to coordinate access to shared resources.

Thread safety is another key consideration. It involves designing classes and methods in a way that allows them to be safely used by multiple threads without causing unexpected behavior. Avoiding mutable shared state, using synchronization techniques, and managing shared resources carefully are essential for writing clean and reliable concurrent code.

Additionally, clean concurrent code pays attention to error handling and resilience. It handles exceptions and errors effectively, ensuring that the system remains stable and resilient under concurrent scenarios. Strategies like fault tolerance, retries, and fallbacks can be employed to maintain the reliability and responsiveness of the system.

Clean design rules: the commandments of code elegance

Clean code follows a set of design principles and rules to ensure well-structured and maintainable code. These rules include the SOLID principles, the Law of Demeter, and other best practices.

Imagine clean code as an architectural masterpiece. It is built on a foundation of solid design principles that guide us in creating elegant and adaptable structures. The SOLID principles (Single Responsibility, Open-Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversion) act as pillars of clean design, providing a blueprint for modular, extensible, and loosely coupled code.

The Law of Demeter, also known as the principle of least knowledge, complements these principles. It advises us to limit a class’s knowledge or dependencies on other classes. By reducing the direct interactions between classes, we promote loose coupling and reduce the risk of cascading changes when modifying a class.

Favoring composition over inheritance is another key principle. Just like building blocks, we assemble objects through composition, combining their behaviors dynamically at runtime. This approach offers greater flexibility and adaptability, allowing us to create code that is easier to maintain and extend.

Above all, simplicity is a fundamental aspect of clean design. We strive to keep our codebase simple, avoiding over-engineering and unnecessary complexity. By prioritizing clarity and readability, we make it easier for ourselves and others to understand and reason about the code.

By following these clean design rules, we create code that is not only functional but also elegant and maintainable, standing the test of time.


As we reach the end of our wild ride through the perils of clean code, let’s reflect on the adventures we’ve shared. We’ve explored the intricacies of code reviews, delved into the art of delivering effective feedback, embraced the power of collaboration through pair programming, and urged ourselves to step beyond our comfort zones.

Remember, the journey towards clean code is not a solitary one. It’s a collective endeavor fueled by empathy, collaboration, and a constant thirst for improvement. So, let’s raise our keyboards, ready to conquer the spaghetti monsters that lurk within our codebases. Together, we shall create software masterpieces that stand the test of time!

Happy coding, and may the anti-spaghetti force be with you!

Experience seamless collaboration on
code reviews.